Riggs V. Palmer Critaically evalute the legal case of Riggs v. Palmer

In the eluding of Riggs v. Palmer, the issue at hand is whether or non Elmer Palmer, a man who purposely poisoned his grandfather, should be allowed to collect his inheritance. It is the duty of Mr. Palmers rightfulnessyer to give sound judicial advice so that he may make a decision, on his own, as to whether or non he wishes to fight for his inheritance. In order for our legal system of rules to be upheld, and as criminal as it may seem, Mr. Palmer essential receive the money. By virtue, laws ar intended to be a written clean-living code meant to govern the people it protects. Laws be written as a means of benefiting the greater thriving of man, and anything which is intended to, whether it succeeds or non, benefit the greater good is innately moral. In the case of Elmer Palmer it is not the law which has created an irreversibly lowly situation, it is the lack at that place of. The law, much like morality, is not without flaw. on that point are laws whos mo ral intentions are woolly-headed in translation, and at that place are laws which apply to almost all persons sensibility just now have not even so been written. There are some people who would read the case of Riggs v. Palmer who would be on the aspect of Mr. Palmer, crossing their fingers in hopes that he receives the money, but the fact dust that a law is not a law until it has been written. In the late 1800s when this case took place, there simply was no law stating that if a beneficiary murders the bearer of a will, then that single should not receive the table of contents of that will. In order to obey the legal system of law, which was created with the highest of moral intentions, Mr. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay