Philosophy and Truth

There atomic number 18 some theories on the meaning of law, and with those theories come whimsys and questions as to why one is more comely than the others. An absolute truth, sometimes called a universal truth, is an unalterable and unceasing fact. The concept of absolute truths (what they are and whether they exist) has been debated among many different groups of people. Philosophers support been solelyting heads when it comes to the definition of absolute truth for hundreds of years. Alternatively, many believe in relative truths, where facts may pull up stakes depending on the circumstances. (Towart) The possibility that I will discuss as the most adequate is the arrangement surmisal. Honestly, I dont possess the capabilities to in full determine the most equal theory of truth. I do, however, deal empirical evidence and steady reasoning to support the remainder theory. There are many valid arguments and questions of this theory that I am non adequate to complet ely refute. I am only able to overcompensate this age old discussion, not to conclude with an exact theory of truth to follow, just my perception of it.\nThe concept of the correspondence theory says that a controversy is consecutive only if the facts given scar up with reality. (Marian) This offer be a really simple approach to ascertain the truth. The basic idea is that if, found on my understanding of reality, the disputation given matches that reality so the statement is true. If the statement does not correspond to reality and so it is false. A statement is a sentence that can be determined to be true or false but not both at the same time. So lastly I use former(prenominal) experiences and beliefs to determine my concept of reality. Then, establish on my idea of reality, I determine if a statement is either true or false.\nTo say of what is that it is not, or of what is not that it is, is false, while to say of what is that it is, or of what is not that it is not , is true (Aristotle) This was Aristotles belief in...