Aristotle

Aristotle was one of the Sophists who studied the limits of knowledge and the nature of moral action. Plato was his teacher, yet some(prenominal) believed in the separation of mind and all matter. They believed equity should be developed for the good of the state and the citizen himself. Aristotle also investigated several(prenominal) opposite subjects: logic, biology, zoology, poetry, and politics, rather than just the in classifyectual side of feeling as Plato did.

        During his life, Aristotle then expanded on Platos thinking. He include justice and goodness, and tangle all citizenry needed to playact properly. He thought that people had that inner voice to tell them what is right (what we have come to call our conscience). He steady went a step further to say ones inner swear sometimes everywhereruled their knowledge and made them go astray. Since he accepted this feeling within the human soul to make a person fall, he began to pay special attention to perusal self-control. He believed the mind could be trained to win over passion or desire. He didnt necessarily feel these other emotions should be eliminated, hardly rather put into a end, which he called the mean. The mean is that middle ground between the two extremes where people would strive to find kayoed the good life was possible.

        Because of this sunrise(prenominal) philosophy, he decided to write a work on ethics. When we begin to examine some of the lines from this work, Ethics, we can make a comparison between his thinking and compulsive behavior. Compulsive behavior today in our society is rather prevalent and do many in all walks of life, including very young people. During this writing, he clearly states that he wants us to consider the correct flair to deal with our own personal actions. In his first point, he comes out and tells us deficiency and excess atomic number 18 both fatal. Bulimia is definitely an extreme behavior. It is not the middle of the road, but an excess, and could be controlled by self-discipline. People who are bulimic go on an eating binge, and then turn around and invite rid of whatever nourishment they gave to their body. The virtue of temperance which would deter bulimia, has never been properly developed in the bulimics case.

This good life, which Aristotle felt was possible under a self-discipline was very incompatible from Platos thinking and other thinkers of the day. Since we are humans with intelligence and our brain is one of our go around qualities, we should be able to keep that balance in our life.

         many a(prenominal) people today are out of that balance in life, and do not work on the virtues that would help them maintain a life pattern that could sustain success and well-being. We have many social living problems today. Many of these issues such as drugs, child abuse, violence, eating disorders, etc. could be lessened with the philosophy Aristotle talked about and put into writing. Many of the coarse philosophers whether they were Greek, Roman, Chinese, or Islamic all came very close to the analogous philosophy, and many have used different words or terms. It all stems from a moral issue of what is acceptable, what moral standards are important to all those people who are in excite or just part of society that wants to keep the best possible life for all.

If you want to get a total essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.